Replies: 36 comments 12 replies
-
Having been a consumer of @omenking's boot camp as well as a guest "teacher" on a module for one of his boot camps, he definitely knows what he is talking about. This post is bang on as constructive criticism for the recently released GitHub certs! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks so much for sharing your feedback here and welcome to our Community @omenking! 🎉 I've shared this feedback with the applicable teams and will follow-up here if we have any additional questions or updates on our end. Thanks again! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Great points @omenking 😎 and thanks for your course! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@omenking thank you so much for your feedback (we did also receive your email), we are going through it and will catch up with you next week on our call. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@omenking thanks for your course! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Great course! Thx bro! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for the course! Very useful! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
Could not have said these critiques better! GitHub listen to him! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Very useful course |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think the fellows who work in GitHub certifications should review your course recordings and make notes based on your feedback. Thanks for the awesome course, Andrew! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for the course @omenking. I just passed the exam in 2 days just by your video. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have seen several videos created by @omenking, and I would advise GitHub integrate his suggestions into their certifications. He definitely knows what he is talking about! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Github, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
What will happen if someone is unable to show up on the day of exam? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Good Efforts. Thank you @omenking |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
This comment has been hidden.
-
Having completed (almost) all of the GitHub introductory training before the certfications existed and having reviewed the GitHub foundations training path that exists now, I couldn't honestly say I would have passed the certification but the course provided by @omenking certainly provided me with enough knowledge to pass the GitHub foundations exam (and I was grateful for the reduced exam fee offered by GitHub). In the case of the GitHub Actions certfication, I'm still struggling despite notionally working in an environment where these functionalities/tools are used, having similar certifications from other providers, having done both the GitHub training path and the course provided by @omenking . Of course, this is my "problem" and it's certainly not the first time I've failed a certifcation exam but I've never been left so bewildered after an exam about what I actually need to know or where I need to reinforce my knowledge. I agree with points made by @omenking to greater or lesser degree and what I certainly do find is that the GitHub certifications are at least in this initial offering not as clear as certifications from other providers regarding exam content and what knowledge you really need to have to pass. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Mate, I appreciate the work you have put in to help a noob like myself get his head around things. I still have a few hours worth of video to go through and I usually squeeze in time here and there. My issue is I tried booking the certification through psi. What a disaster that has been. they took my money and no time slot booked. Now I am waiting for customer service but the last 3 replies from them all keep saying to call numbers which are disconnected..... If anyone has any advice on how to proceed please let me know. They are so unprofessional I would class them as a scam but they are linked through github so you would think they are legit. Are there any other providers you can take the exam through other than psi? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I only used Dumpschool.com with study guide to prepare for the GITHUB FOUNDATION exam for 2 weeks: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@omenking thanks for your course! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Good job! Really appreciate your effort. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That would be nice but I believe there are specific questions which is non evaluated. They pop up randomly. Let’s say you attend only first 60 and got 7 of those useless questions and 3 wrong answers then you score 50 out of 60. On Jan 23, 2025, at 4:52 PM, PRIYABRATA2 ***@***.***> wrote:
I have a doubt, when appearing can we give answers to only 60 questions out of 75 , as its getting evaluated out of 60. If we appear all questions , may be initial 60 questions will get considered. Any thoughts ?
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
any idea, then only first 60 questions are getting evaluated and next 15
not ?
…On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 3:09 PM Brenda Thistle ***@***.***> wrote:
@PRIYABRATA2 <https://github.com/PRIYABRATA2> you'd have to answer all 75.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#87415 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APJOMVXBHOD7CQLMSCRWFDT2MJJS5AVCNFSM6AAAAABB2TW4JGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCOJUGQZTSNY>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Priyabrata Samantaray
Mob No-9439902551
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for the clarity.
…On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, 3:17 PM Brenda Thistle ***@***.***> wrote:
The non-scored items are randomly placed throughout the exam.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#87415 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APJOMVX6N7XWJ4XQUNMF3232MJKO5AVCNFSM6AAAAABB2TW4JGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCOJUGQ2DQOA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Very useful, Thanks Andrew. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am really enjoying the learning, thanks for preparing it for us. Cheers!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@omenking may not have all the answers, but he’s got great vibes and Google ✨😂 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Great work in the course! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey GitHub,
I'm providing feedback for the GitHub Foundations and general feedback about the GitHub Certifications.
I think the certifications are a great idea, and I see alot of value for folks learning GitHub.
I did spot some issues which I hope can get resolved or choices I think I'd like to convince you to change.
Upfront Certification Information Issues
Lack of Course Code
Please get official course codes that indicate the version of the exam.
Most Certification will have course codes and as a content creator I can tell you students use the course codes to know if an exam is the most current version and will use it as a search term to find study materials.
I was able to implicitly determine course codes by the initialisms being used in the links for the certifications:
Ideally I'd like to see something like GHF-100 or something that indicates version.
Lack of Domain Breakdowns
Domains are the sections of the exam.
Certification exams will tell you the percentage of questions that will appear on your exam.
For someone studying for exams the domain percentages helps avoid under or over study specific domains.
GitHub Certification provides no such percentages.
My experience for my exam sitting for the pool of questions based on given domains was unbalanced.
I had a significant number of questions about GitHub Enterprise Server and GitHub Enterprise Cloud.
Based on the exam guide outline, I did not expect this many questions.
I did not expect the depth of the questions to be asked.
Since there is a GitHub Admistration certification, I would have thought more in-depth questions would be left to that exam.
Lack of Passing Score
Certification exams will tell you how many points are in the exam and how many you need eg. 700 / 1000 which would roughly be 70%. Since exams used Scaled Scoring, it's understood that you could technically get 70% and still fail due to the distribution of questions and possible points for questions.
GitHub has decided not to share the passing score.
Missing Content
When I operated my bootcamps I noticed there was a significant gap with:
Technical professionals without developer backgrounds showed a strong interest in picking up these skills to round their skill set to the point that a Git Bootcamp was highly requested.
Git Basics Section Missing
If you want to use GitHub you need some Git skills.
I would think that there would be a bare-bones primer front-loaded into this GitHub Foundations, and the exam would validate this knowledge.
The only exam question I validated git knowledge was
git checkout -b branch-name
Developer Section Missing
Developer tools are completely absent in all the GitHub Certification exam outlines.
Things I would have expected in GitHub Foundations:
And yet, we have exam questions asking us to know the structure of GitHub Actions workflow files.
I would have thought the concepts of GitHub Actions would have been enough in GitHub Foundations and technical-specific questions would be left for the GitHub Actions Certification.
Format of Questions
The questions are multiple-choice and multiple-select, which is common for foundation/fundamental certifications.
The length of questions and choices were of expected length.
What I think will frustrate or annoy test takers is the fact that this is a very broad exam, and yet the exam decides to go too deep, asking about technical specifics of GitHub features.
Example: In Github Project Insights, a question would want you to know the types of charts provided (Historical and Current charts). Why isn't it enough to know it has graphs? Why get that detailed on this specific feature?
Example: When using Github Issues, it will ask you to choose the correct advanced search syntax out of a lineup with multiple filters. Why isn't it enough to know how robust the search is? Why do I have to lose a point because I can't recall the exact advanced search syntax filter syntax?
Then there are questions where there are technically more correct answers. This can happen in Professional certifications, but normally, Foundations/Fundamentals certification format their choices as Horse, Horse, Zebra, Elephant.
I could write about 30 examples I can recall, But I don't want to be creating an exam dump, so just take my word that the questions need work.
Beta Features in Outline and Exam
I am confused about the inclusion of Beta features in exams.
Generally, certification will only have GA features, yet GitHub includes them.
One in particular that I could not get working was GitHub Issue Forms.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions